Monday, 31 March 2014

To My Dear And Loving Husband By Anne Bradstreet



If ever two were one, then surely we.
If ever man were loved by wife, then thee.
If ever wife was happy in a man,
Compare with me, ye women, if you can.
I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold,
Or all the riches that the East doth hold.
My love is such that rivers cannot quench,
Nor ought but love from thee give recompense.
Thy love is such I can no way repay;
The heavens reward thee manifold, I pray.
Then while we live, in love let’s so persever,
That when we live no more, we may live ever.


ANALYSIS:
The poet conveys the message of love through rhyming words. She also says that love is the richest.
She says that love is more precious than anything in the world. It is evident in “I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold,” and “Or all the riches that the East doth hold.” This suggests that the person treasures love more than even the richest in the world. This is suggested in love is more than a lot of gold or the money a rich person could hold.  Love is the most rich in the world .thus; she says that love is the most precious in the world.
She also creates the loving and soothing feeling by using rhythmic method and structure. It is evident in the rhyming of the words in AA and BB method. In “we, thee, man, can” we can see that she uses the rhyming of the words to convey the message of love by strengthening the words and stressing on them. This gives the soothing impact too. Thus she uses the rhyming of words to convey the message of love.
She also says that love cannot be compared .It also cannot be filled. It is evident in “My love is such that rivers cannot quench,” This suggests that love cannot be compared as it is unquenchable and cannot be filled. It explains that love is infinity and it can last forever where even the biggest rivers cannot fill. Thus, she says that love cannot be filled.
In conclusion, she has taught me that love is one of the most beautiful thing in the world.
 
The above picture depicts the scene of love.

Sunday, 30 March 2014

Poem Without an End By Yehuda Amichai



Inside the brand-new museum
there’s an old synagogue.
Inside the synagogue
is me.
Inside me
my heart.
Inside my heart
a museum.
Inside the museum
a synagogue,
inside it
me,
inside me
my heart,
inside my heart
a museum


ANALOGY:
This poem talk about how his religion is always in his heart, even though a lot of things is changing. The evidence from passage is “Inside the brand-new museum there’s an old synagogue. Inside the synagogue is me. Inside me my heart. Inside my heart a museum.” The word “ synagogue” means a Jewish house of worship, often having facilities for religious instruction or an assembly or congregation of Jews for the purpose of religious worship. The “brand-new museum” shows that life around the persona is changing, but the “old synagogue”  and “Inside the synagogue is me” shows that even though something new is built, the persona’s loyalty for his religion, which is Jewish,  will never change.
Also, this poem is talking about how the persona is older in age.The evidence from passage is “Inside my heart a museum.” If inside the persona’s hear lies a museum, it indicates that the persona has works of art, scientific specimens, or other objects of permanent value are kept inside his/her. Without being older in age and witnessing a lot of things, one will not be able to have a “museum” inside his/her heart.

All in all, I feel that the author is trying to express that the older generation is always loyal to their religion, even when the world is evolving into something different.


 
The above picture depicts a scene inside a synagogue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP5D66kF0d8



The Tyger By William Blake


The Tyger

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand, dare sieze the fire?

And what shoulder, & what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand? & what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And water'd heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?

Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

William Blake


Analysing:

The poet uses rhyming words at the end of sentences, repetition, imagery and rhetorical  questions pertaining to “The Tyger” throughout the whole poem.

The poet uses structure in the poem which can be seen from the use of repetition of “Tyger” in the first stanza. This is to express that “The Tyger” is being called repeatedly, thus creating a chanting mood and catches the attention of the reader.

The poet also uses imagery in the poem to describe “The Tyger”. This is evident from “burning bright” which tells us that “The Tyger” as a ferocious, intelligent and powerful creature.

The poet also uses language in the poem to further talk about “The Tyger”. This is evident from “What immortal hand or eye. Could frame thy fearful symmetry?” which tells us that which “immortal hand or eye”, which may most likely be pertaining to God or someone who is big and powerful, can “frame thy fearful symmetry”. From “frame thy fearful symmetry”, “frame” can refer to putting something in something else, so as to contain it, like framing a picture, so if we frame something, it would not be able to get away. While for “fearful symmetry”, “fearful” can mean the scariness of “The Tyger” and ”symmetry” can mean the artistic beauty of something, which can refer to “The Tyger”. Therefore, the poet is saying that what God “frame” is a beautiful creature which is fearful.

The poet uses imagery and language to create a picture of Heaven and Hell and talking about the God. This is evident from “distant deeps or skies”, “distant deeps” referring to Hell and “skies” referring to Heaven. With this, the poet asks about who is the God who created “The Tyger” by writing “Burnt the fire of thine eyes”. Then, he goes on to ask if it’s the God in the “skies” or the Lucifer in the “distant deeps”. The poet goes on wondering about what God could have created “The Tyger” by writing “On what wings dare he aspire? What the hand, dare sieze the fire?” which tells us that the poet is asking what does the God do.

The poet then again uses language and imagery to ask who was the one to create this creature by using rhetorical questions. This is evident from “And what shoulder, and what art could twist the sinews of thy heart?”, the “thy” is referring to “The Tyger” and “Could twist the sinews of thy heart.”, the word “twisted” used to tell us how “twisted” or sometimes corrupt Humans can be.

The poet also uses language to talk about the creation of “The Tyger”. This is evident from “And when thy heart began to beat, What dread hand? & what dread feet?”, which tells us when the heart of “The Tyger” beats, God asks himself if he dreaded creating “The Tyger”, which is powerful and capable of doing good and evil.

The poet also uses imagery and language to create an image of a God trying to create “The Tyger” and what was “The Tyger” like. This is evident from “What the hammer? what the chain? In what furnace was thy brain? What the anvil?” which shows us a God is hammering away to create his creature and from “In what furnace was thy brain” tells us that the creature was made of hard and metallic materials. And the poet goes on to say that “The Tyger” is a evil creature which is evident from “what dread grasp, Dare its deadly terrors clasp?”. The words “dread”, “deadly” and “terrors” gives us a feeling of something dark and evil, thus by using these words, it tells us that “The Tyger” was created by a God in Heaven and therefore is capable of doing good and also bad.

The poet uses imagery to express the feelings of God after creating “The Tyger”. This is evident from “Did he smile his work to see? Did he who made the Lamb make thee?” which tells us if God was happy with his creation and did he actually smile upon that. “the Lamb” refers to innocence due to it being white and it is pure, thus it is incapable of doing wrong and only doing good. Therefore, this tells us that it is hard to believe but it is true that it is was the same God who had created two creatures, one being pure but the other known as being evil.

The poet then again uses repetition of “Tyger! Tyger! burning bright, In the forests of the nights, What immortal hand or eye”, which are present in the first three lines of the poem. Unlike in the first stanza, the last sentence of the last stanza is different. Instead of “Could frame thy fearful symmetry?”, the rhetorical question is now “Dare frame thy fearful symmetry”, which tells us that it is not if God is powerful enough to create a creature like “The Tyger”  but whether or not he dares to create a create like “The Tyger”.
All in all, this poem talks about the creation of “The Tyger”, which can do both good or evil, depending on its choice and thus is terrifying as we will not know which it will choose and with a free will to choose, it may lead them astray from being loyal to their creator. But despite the fact that “The Tyger” might turn his back on his creator, God, due to possessing traits of evil, God still created “The Tyger”.
Picture of a tiger, which is a ferocious creature just like "The Tyger"



Video on The Tyger